Oct 14, 2025 · The popular image of jet fuel literally melting steel conflates melting point with loss of structural strength, which are distinct phenomena; structural steel melts above roughly …

Mar 20, 2023 · The idea is that the collapse of the two World Trade Center towers was a controlled demolition because burning jet fuel doesn’t reach a high enough temperature to …

Dec 16, 2015 · "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is one of the most widely known arguments that 9/11 was an inside job. It's also one of the dumbest.

Oct 28, 2025 · In summary, although jet fuel can create high temperatures, it cannot melt steel, a fact supported by temperature data on the burning capabilities of jet fuel and the melting point …

Sep 1, 2013 · With regard to NIST’s statement in its post-report publication that there was no evidence for “the melting of steel in a jet-fuel ignited fire in the towers”: This is a statement that …

"Jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is a frequent comment by 9/11 truthers who maintain that an airplane crash into the World Trade Center wouldn't melt the steel infrastructure of the tower. …

Jet fuel cannot melt steel, but it can burn hot enough to weaken steel. On Sept. 11, the jet fuel burned hot enough to bend steel and contribute to the Twin Towers’ collapse.

In conclusion, while jet fuel can reach temperatures near the melting point of steel, real-world conditions make it unlikely to actually melt the beams. Thermite, though hotter, isn't practical …

Oct 7, 2024 · The “Jet fuel cannot melt steel beams” argument, which has become a meme, suggests that 9/11 was an inside job. However, it is true that jet fuel burns at a temperature …

Sep 11, 2025 · The posting is entitled “Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC.” FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit, not hot enough to melt steel (2750 degrees …